AEO Grader Tools: Which Score Helps You Fix the Right Problem?

A score of 82 might mean AI describes your brand favorably, or that one page has readable headings and open crawler access. Those are different jobs. Match the grader to the question you have to answer, then keep the evidence behind its number.

The prices and product descriptions come from each provider's October 6 public page. Xtrusio is listed for the work after a grade; it does not sell a single AEO grade.

Which AEO grader should you try first?

If you want a quick read on how AI describes your company, start with HubSpot. You enter a company, location, product or service, and industry. Its free grader produces a one-time brand report across OpenAI, Perplexity and Gemini systems. The five parts of its score tell you whether the issue is sentiment, recognition, presence, share of voice or competitive position. HubSpot sells ongoing prompt monitoring separately.

The next buying question is who will turn that grade into a corrected public fact, then check whether the answer changed. Software like Xtrusio can keep the buyer question, saved answer and cited pages beside the page your team fixes. Judge that follow-up separately from a one-time score.

If you want a free brand grade across Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, LLM Pulse says its grader uses those five systems and reports visibility, citation, content readiness and competitive position. You enter a domain, email address and region; the grade arrives by email, with newsletter subscription disclosed on the form. Decide whether an emailed report and its question sample fit your team's use before submitting.

If your question is whether one page is usable as a source, put that URL into Citlyze's page grader. It checks the page and crawler controls, then returns structural fixes. Citlyze says this free check does not call an AI model. A strong page score is therefore a reason to move on to the answer check, not a report that ChatGPT recommended you.

AEO Grader.org offers a free estimate based on Gemini and Google Search grounding, then advertises a $10 report that adds answers and sources from four engines. Do not read the free estimate as if it were the paid multi-engine result. Ask for the actual question and answer behind a claimed gap before deciding what to change.

Mangools' AI Search Grader combines visibility, average position and model weighting into one score. Its published FAQ says the no-account version includes ChatGPT, Mistral and Llama, while other named models require a free account. The page says “seven” models in one place but lists six by name; check the model access shown in the tool when choosing it. Clickx describes a combined SEO and AEO grade, with a free audit request rather than a clearly documented instant self-service report. Both answer different buying questions from a one-page structure checker.

What does an AEO grade measure?

The number means little until you know what went into it. HubSpot's published 100-point formula assigns 40 points to sentiment, 20 to presence quality, 20 to brand recognition, 10 to share of voice and 10 to market competition. A score of 70 there says something about HubSpot's blend of brand-description measures. It is not a claim that your company appeared in 70 percent of your buyers' questions.

Citlyze's 0 to 100 score answers a different question: can an answer engine reach and extract useful material from this page? The free check reads the URL, robots.txt and optional llms.txt. Its published explanation gives crawler access the heaviest weight. It does not sample a buyer asking for a vendor shortlist. Two scores out of 100 can therefore disagree without either tool being broken.

Save the buyer question, the engine's answer and its cited URLs as one record. If a cited page describes your product incorrectly, your team can name the exact correction, publish it where you have authority and recheck the same question later. Xtrusio saves the question, answer and sources; its Content Strategy plan records page work and public URLs separately. A later answer check tells you whether that page appears as a source.

Can a grader show the wrong answer and its source?

Ask for three items you can open: the exact question, the answer text and the cited URL. If a report gives only a score, you know a priority to investigate but not yet which public statement caused it. A cited page is a lead, not proof that the page alone caused the answer.

The Xtrusio example below is a saved August 2026 check for “best chatgpt rank tracking tools,” with ChatGPT selected and the target brand marked absent. It is a dated question record, not a current comparison of the graders in this article.

View full size

The saved question is visible with ChatGPT selected and the target mention marked No. Open the answer before deciding why the brand was absent.

View full size

The same saved check lists seven cited pages. Open a page to see whether it contains the product fact your buyer needed.

Suppose a buyer asks whether your software supports a named integration. The assistant says no and cites an old comparison page. Your next task is to verify the integration with your product team, then correct your own integration page or request a factual update to that comparison. A generic “raise your AEO score” task would miss the specific error. After the update is public, ask the same question under comparable conditions and save the new answer and sources.

The free tools expose different amounts of that trail. Ahrefs lists top cited pages in its free preview. AEO Grader.org advertises verbatim answers and cited sources in its paid report. HubSpot's public grader page describes a written interpretation and score breakdown; open the actual report before assuming it includes every underlying citation. Citlyze's free page check has no AI answer to show because it scores the page's structure.

Ahrefs' free AI Visibility Checker is another route when the citation trail matters more than a grade. It shows a limited preview of brand mentions, topics, cited domains and cited pages. The free preview displays five results per section; fuller history and custom prompts are part of Brand Radar. It belongs beside a grader as a source-finding check, not in a comparison of score formulas.

When is a free grade enough?

Use a free grade when you need to choose the next investigation. If it points to a blocked page, fix access. If it points to an unclear brand description, open the relevant answers and sources. If it gives you a list of cited pages, read them and check the product facts against your current offer.

Move to repeated tracking when the decision depends on whether a fix worked for a known buyer task. Keep the same question, engine, market and collection method, and record the date, answer, cited pages and page you changed. Compare the answer's accuracy, whether your brand is named and whether the corrected page is cited. One score can start the work; this small answer log tells you what happened next.

If you want your own buyer questions traced from answer and source to a specific page correction and later check, request a free Xtrusio evaluation. Ongoing writing, publishing and repeat checks are quoted separately.